Money
69/100Leaking · 3/3 answered
This example uses answers for a fictional service business. It shows the report format, calculations and suggested actions. Your results will depend on your answers.
Lower means less modelled operating risk.
Leaking · 3/3 answered
Leaking · 3/3 answered
Leaking · 3/3 answered
Leaking · 3/3 answered
Leaking · 3/3 answered
Leaking · 3/3 answered
Watch · 3/3 answered
How often does the scope grow without anyone billing for the extra work?
OftenExtra work may consume capacity without extra payment. Some additions are deliberate goodwill; separate those from unapproved scope changes.
Review recent changes against the original scope. Record who approved each change and whether it was billed, exchanged for other work or intentionally included.
Have your retainers been re-costed against today's real costs in the last 12 months?
NoRecurring work can change after its price is agreed. An old cost estimate leaves uncertainty; this question does not apply when there are no retainers.
For one active retainer, compare recent delivery effort and direct costs with its included scope and payment terms. Document any mismatch before renegotiating.
Roughly what share of worked hours actually gets logged?
40 %A low recorded share leaves part of delivery effort unexplained. The missing share measures a visibility gap, not proven lost productivity.
Compare recorded hours with a representative week of reported work. Identify whether gaps come from missing entries, unclear categories or incomplete adoption.
Evidence basis: Records and estimates
Service model: Both
Your chosen focus: Client profitability. Use this alongside the scored priorities below.
7 / 40 × 100
Reported time allocation, not automatically wasted time.
Your reported typical week
Review these tasks to identify possible improvements. The report does not assume that all of this time can be saved.
4 / 40 × 100
May overlap with meetings. Do not add the two shares.
40 − 30
Longer than the typical term you entered. Different invoice terms or disputes may explain the gap; check actual due dates.
No answered indicator falls in the model’s lowest-risk band. This does not mean the business has no strengths; the assessment may not capture them.
Use these suggested dates to plan your review. They do not promise results. Choose a responsible person before starting.
For one active retainer, compare recent delivery effort and direct costs with its included scope and payment terms. Document any mismatch before renegotiating.
Suggested responsible role: Account lead with the finance leadTest one change with the suggested owner. Use this measure to set a realistic target: Active retainers reviewed against current costs / active retainers. Record the review period and included cost categories.
Suggested responsible role: Account lead with the finance leadCompare the same measure with your starting point: Active retainers reviewed against current costs / active retainers. Record the review period and included cost categories.
Suggested responsible role: Account lead with the finance leadEach contribution is the answer’s risk value × its weight ÷ the total answered weight in that category. Contributions are rounded for display and may differ slightly from the rounded category total.
Risk value: 55/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 18.3 category points
Risk value: 80/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 32 category points
Risk value: 70/100 · Weight: 0.8 · Contribution: 18.7 category points
Risk value: 50/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 20 category points
Risk value: 75/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 25 category points
Risk value: 60/100 · Weight: 0.8 · Contribution: 16 category points
Risk value: 65/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 20.3 category points
Risk value: 85/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 26.6 category points
Risk value: 60/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 22.5 category points
Risk value: 55/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 18.3 category points
Risk value: 65/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 26 category points
Risk value: 45/100 · Weight: 0.8 · Contribution: 12 category points
Risk value: 70/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 23.3 category points
Risk value: 45/100 · Weight: 0.9 · Contribution: 13.5 category points
Risk value: 85/100 · Weight: 1.1 · Contribution: 31.2 category points
Risk value: 65/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 22.4 category points
Risk value: 55/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 19 category points
Risk value: 35/100 · Weight: 0.9 · Contribution: 10.9 category points
Risk value: 45/100 · Weight: 1.1 · Contribution: 16 category points
Risk value: 50/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 16.1 category points
Risk value: 50/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 16.1 category points
These scenarios show amounts calculated from your category scores and selected revenue range. They are not measured losses, validated financial forecasts or promised savings. The factors are model assumptions, not verified industry benchmarks. Categories may overlap, so do not add the amounts together.
Per month · USD
37,500 × 69/100 × 0.02 to 0.06
Per month · USD
37,500 × 61/100 × 0.03 to 0.08
Per month · USD
37,500 × 69/100 × 0.04 to 0.1
Per month · USD
37,500 × 56/100 × 0.01 to 0.05
Per month · USD
37,500 × 68/100 × 0.02 to 0.06
Per month · USD
37,500 × 52/100 × 0.02 to 0.07
Per month · USD
37,500 × 48/100 × 0.01 to 0.03
The same answers produce the same risk scores under RADAR v1. Report v2 explains those scores and suggests what to check next. This is a self-assessment for service businesses; it does not verify accounting records, legal compliance, security or technical AI capabilities. Answer coverage shows how many applicable questions you completed, not whether the answers are accurate.
Inspect the scoring rules