SAMPLE BUSINESS / MODELLED DEMO

Here’s where
to look closer.

This example uses answers for a fictional service business. It shows the report format, calculations and suggested actions. Your results will depend on your answers.

BUSINESS LEAK SCORE61/100Leaking

Lower means less modelled operating risk.

21/21Applicable questions answered
7/7Dimensions assessed
CompleteCompleteness of answers
48/100AI data readiness · 5/5 inputs · medium
Run your own scan

Risk indicators
by area.

Money

69/100

Leaking · 3/3 answered

Time

61/100

Leaking · 3/3 answered

Margin

69/100

Leaking · 3/3 answered

Cash

56/100

Leaking · 3/3 answered

Focus

68/100

Leaking · 3/3 answered

Execution

52/100

Leaking · 3/3 answered

Data hygiene

48/100

Watch · 3/3 answered

YOUR FIRST PRIORITIES

Start by checking
these answers.

PRIORITY 01

Money

YOUR ANSWER

How often does the scope grow without anyone billing for the extra work?

Often

Extra work may consume capacity without extra payment. Some additions are deliberate goodwill; separate those from unapproved scope changes.

First action

Review recent changes against the original scope. Record who approved each change and whether it was billed, exchanged for other work or intentionally included.

Suggested responsible role
Account lead with the delivery lead
What to measure
Change requests with a recorded scope and billing decision / all reviewed change requests. Track unresolved extra hours separately.
PRIORITY 02

Margin

YOUR ANSWER

Have your retainers been re-costed against today's real costs in the last 12 months?

No

Recurring work can change after its price is agreed. An old cost estimate leaves uncertainty; this question does not apply when there are no retainers.

First action

For one active retainer, compare recent delivery effort and direct costs with its included scope and payment terms. Document any mismatch before renegotiating.

Suggested responsible role
Account lead with the finance lead
What to measure
Active retainers reviewed against current costs / active retainers. Record the review period and included cost categories.
PRIORITY 03

Time

YOUR ANSWER

Roughly what share of worked hours actually gets logged?

40 %

A low recorded share leaves part of delivery effort unexplained. The missing share measures a visibility gap, not proven lost productivity.

First action

Compare recorded hours with a representative week of reported work. Identify whether gaps come from missing entries, unclear categories or incomplete adoption.

Suggested responsible role
Operations lead
What to measure
Weekly recording coverage using the same team and denominator. Track unclassified recorded time separately from entirely missing time.
YOUR BUSINESS CONTEXT

What the answers tell us.

Evidence basis: Records and estimates

Service model: Both

Your chosen focus: Client profitability. Use this alongside the scored priorities below.

Share of working week in internal meetings17.5%

7 / 40 × 100

Reported time allocation, not automatically wasted time.

Repeated admin work per person4 h / week

Your reported typical week

Review these tasks to identify possible improvements. The report does not assume that all of this time can be saved.

Share of working week in repeated admin work10%

4 / 40 × 100

May overlap with meetings. Do not add the two shares.

Collection time compared with agreed payment terms10 days

40 − 30

Longer than the typical term you entered. Different invoice terms or disputes may explain the gap; check actual due dates.

POSITIVE SIGNS IN YOUR ANSWERS

Review your strengths.

No answered indicator falls in the model’s lowest-risk band. This does not mean the business has no strengths; the assessment may not capture them.

A PRACTICAL FOLLOW-UP

Your next 30 days.

Use these suggested dates to plan your review. They do not promise results. Choose a responsible person before starting.

BY DAY 7

Establish the facts

For one active retainer, compare recent delivery effort and direct costs with its included scope and payment terms. Document any mismatch before renegotiating.

Suggested responsible role: Account lead with the finance lead
BY DAY 14

Test one change

Test one change with the suggested owner. Use this measure to set a realistic target: Active retainers reviewed against current costs / active retainers. Record the review period and included cost categories.

Suggested responsible role: Account lead with the finance lead
BY DAY 30

Review the outcome

Compare the same measure with your starting point: Active retainers reviewed against current costs / active retainers. Record the review period and included cost categories.

Suggested responsible role: Account lead with the finance lead
ANSWER BY ANSWER

Follow every score to its source.

Each contribution is the answer’s risk value × its weight ÷ the total answered weight in that category. Contributions are rounded for display and may differ slightly from the rounded category total.

Money3/3

How many of your projects start with a written, agreed scope?

Some

Risk value: 55/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 18.3 category points

How often does the scope grow without anyone billing for the extra work?

Often

Risk value: 80/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 32 category points

When did you last raise your prices?

More than 2 years ago

Risk value: 70/100 · Weight: 0.8 · Contribution: 18.7 category points

Time3/3

Does the team track its working time?

Partially / some people

Risk value: 50/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 20 category points

Roughly what share of worked hours actually gets logged?

40 %

Risk value: 75/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 25 category points

About how many hours a week does one person spend in internal meetings?

7 h/week

Risk value: 60/100 · Weight: 0.8 · Contribution: 16 category points

Margin3/3

What share of your revenue comes from your single biggest client?

45 %

Risk value: 65/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 20.3 category points

Have your retainers been re-costed against today's real costs in the last 12 months?

No

Risk value: 85/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 26.6 category points

What share of your clients do you SUSPECT are unprofitable?

20 %

Risk value: 60/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 22.5 category points

Cash3/3

On average, how many days pass between sending an invoice and getting paid?

40 days

Risk value: 55/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 18.3 category points

What share of your revenue is currently overdue?

15 %

Risk value: 65/100 · Weight: 1.2 · Contribution: 26 category points

Do you take deposits or prepayment before work starts?

Sometimes

Risk value: 45/100 · Weight: 0.8 · Contribution: 12 category points

Focus3/3

How many tools does the team actively use for delivery, communication and money?

9 tools

Risk value: 70/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 23.3 category points

How many projects does one person typically run in parallel?

4 projects

Risk value: 45/100 · Weight: 0.9 · Contribution: 13.5 category points

What share of the founder's week goes into delivery work (not steering the business)?

65 %

Risk value: 85/100 · Weight: 1.1 · Contribution: 31.2 category points

Execution3/3

What share of work ships later than the date you promised?

18 %

Risk value: 65/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 22.4 category points

How often does finished work come back for rework?

Sometimes

Risk value: 55/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 19 category points

Does every project have exactly one accountable owner?

Mostly

Risk value: 35/100 · Weight: 0.9 · Contribution: 10.9 category points

Data hygiene3/3

Could you state last month's profit within ±10% right now?

Roughly

Risk value: 45/100 · Weight: 1.1 · Contribution: 16 category points

How many systems hold your money data?

Two

Risk value: 50/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 16.1 category points

Can you see anywhere which clients are profitable?

Partially

Risk value: 50/100 · Weight: 1 · Contribution: 16.1 category points

Illustrative financial scenarios and assumptions

These scenarios show amounts calculated from your category scores and selected revenue range. They are not measured losses, validated financial forecasts or promised savings. The factors are model assumptions, not verified industry benchmarks. Categories may overlap, so do not add the amounts together.

Money

$517.50 to $1,552.50

Per month · USD

37,500 × 69/100 × 0.02 to 0.06

Time

$686.25 to $1,830.00

Per month · USD

37,500 × 61/100 × 0.03 to 0.08

Margin

$1,035.00 to $2,587.50

Per month · USD

37,500 × 69/100 × 0.04 to 0.1

Cash

$210.00 to $1,050.00

Per month · USD

37,500 × 56/100 × 0.01 to 0.05

Focus

$510.00 to $1,530.00

Per month · USD

37,500 × 68/100 × 0.02 to 0.06

Execution

$390.00 to $1,365.00

Per month · USD

37,500 × 52/100 × 0.02 to 0.07

Data hygiene

$180.00 to $540.00

Per month · USD

37,500 × 48/100 × 0.01 to 0.03

Inspect assumptions and weights

What this report can tell you.

The same answers produce the same risk scores under RADAR v1. Report v2 explains those scores and suggests what to check next. This is a self-assessment for service businesses; it does not verify accounting records, legal compliance, security or technical AI capabilities. Answer coverage shows how many applicable questions you completed, not whether the answers are accurate.

Inspect the scoring rules

See what PLYNT
can do for your business.

PLYNT / PRODUCT DESIGN PREVIEW